To defeat the censors CMN has added "Push Notifications" - When a pop up window asks if you want this, say yes!

CMN ON BOARD LIVE STREAM AUDIO PLAYER

56K

32K

Click to listen live

2nd 32K

 

Christian Media

Communiqué

DOMINOES

Part XI

 

 

 

 

 

The previous installment of Dominoes introduced the thorny subject of the Dialectic, and due to the complexity of the subject, a brief review of the topic is in order.

The Dialectic, also called the Dialogue to Consensus, is an intellectual tactic utilized to convince a person, or a group, to move away from a fixed, or didactic, point of view. Its roots are philosophical, and the system is related to psychiatry, analysis, group therapy, and other aspects of social behaviour. To zero in on just one aspect of it, by encouraging the subject that they are free to talk about anything in a non-judgmental environment, the therapist develops a relationship with the subject.

 

The therapist, sometimes called a Facilitator, is rarely judgmental concerning subjects that might ordinarily be taboo in a Didactic (fixed) setting, and it is very important that the idea be established that there is no such thing as absolute truth.

 

This basic premise runs counter to Scripture, as the Word of God is divinely given, and it is the absolute truth.

 

The system we are investigating has also been called Diaprax, a compound word where Dia is the Dialogue, and the Praxis is the practice of the Dialog. At Christian Media, since we are focused on Bible Prophecy, we dubbed it Dragonspeak, connecting it with the primary Scripture anticipating the prevalence of this way of thinking in the end times.

 

“And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon” (Revelation 13:11).

 

It is not an accident the “Dragonspeak” phenomenon is connected to the imagery in the book of Revelation referred to as the False Prophet – as opposed to the other character usually dubbed Antichrist.

 

At this point in time, the practice of the Dialectic is the subject of thousands of books, andithas now infected every aspect of modern life, especially in the realm of education. Although it was refined in the Germany of the 1930’s in a think tank known as the Frankfort School, the core Communist figures fled Germany as Hitler was rising, and they were welcomed with open arms by the American educational establishment.

 

Dragonspeak has now penetrated all American public education, ensuring that our entire generation has seen the authority of the family paradigm subverted, and virtually all schools are now under the control of the agents of tyranny, inhabited by what the Scripture refers to as “the spirit of the world,” or what Christian Media more specifically refers to as the Spirit of “Hell.”

 

“Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God“ (I Corinthians 2:12).

 

This blanket appraisal includes the organizational structures of the Christian church.

 

We can more fully understand the ideas associated with Dragonspeak by recognizing the Bible paradigm which it was designed to replace.

 

If we think of the formula in three steps, we can perceive what the Scripture teaches. The first two are usually uniform:

 

1. Life (the Father, authority of God, Scripture, and Truth) – this we may also identify as the Patriarchal thesis.

 

2. Rebellion (the Child, questions/challenges authority) – this we may also identify as the Heresyarchal component that conflicts with the Patriarchal.

 

If the father was raised properly, and he exercises the authority of the office justly once he is grown, he chastens the child, instilling the values of the absolute truth. Thus, the Paternal role is primary, as the father of the family, exercising the authority of the office, chastens the child.

 

3. The third step widely varies. If the child responds Biblically because he was raised to honour the Lord, he or she repeats the process when they are grown, and in the role of the parent.

 

“Despise not the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he chasteneth…If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons” (Hebrew 12:5-7).

 

If the child rebels further (even with the chastening) and the values intrinsic in the absolute truth were not instilled because the father did not perform his Biblically mandated role, the process of departing from the truth continues.

 

“The Lord is longsuffering, and of great mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression, and by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation” (Numbers 14:18).

 

For centuries, this paradigm was seen throughout society, from the just kings who were revered as patriarchal figures, on down to the lowliest of the citizenry.

 

Karl Marx, and the European “intellectuals” who developed the Dragonspeak formula, recognized the family as an extension of the LORD’s Patriarchal role. He reversed the roles of the Father and the Child, characterizing the Heresyarchal as the key figure – the so called “Noble” inner child who is being “repressed” by the “outmoded” restraint of the parental figure – thus making the rebellious Heresy proponent into the one which is to be encouraged.

 

This is where the phrase “God is dead” originates because it attempts to discredit – i.e. “kill” the Father figure by removing the restraint of the Patriarch. As this system has now permeated all subsequent political development in varying degrees, the result was to symbolically remove the father figure from the equation, in order to make a “better” godless world.

 

The idea was to remake society in a new social construct in which the state becomes the father figure, which supersedes the traditional role of the parent. For instance, even as this article is being written, the American government is attempting to assert its authority over that of the parents, illegally requiring children in schools to be vaccinated in order to attend classes – regardless of the parent’s historic rights concerning their medical choices for the child.

 

Of course, in totalitarian societies, the parents have already been stripped of their rights, and America is the last nation where the citizens are still clinging to their constitutional rights.

 

Most of the previous comments were made from a political perspective, but there are many different ways the Marxist formula may be expressed, and an increasing number of genuine Christians are just now beginning to understand the Spiritual transformations that have occurred in the last century.

 

The recognition that the Dialogue to Consensus actually targets the way believers think, and is a manifestation of the long prophesied Falling Away (II Thessalonians 2:3), is becoming self evident to an unknown number of alarmed believers. Although Christians and conservative thinkers are protesting the propagandistic tyranny that is inherent in the Social engineering generated by the Internet portals (Facebook, Google, Instagram, and Twitter/X, etc) that are the “Facilitators” of the Dragonspeak system , they continue to participate in the practice, thereby preserving the relationships they have developed.

 

The formula that has emerged is the Truth (the Thesis), collides with “another truth” (the Antithesis), and because the truth threatens the relationships the believer has with their government, their church, their family, their jobs, and virtually everything else, the individual (already caught in the snare of the Dialectic – Luke 21:35) seeks a Dialog to diminish the facts/truth (into a Synthesis) in order to sustain the relationships.

 

A good example of this process may be reduced to an unvaccinated person who reasons `If I believe the vaccine is as deadly as those telling the truth assert, I’ll lose my job if I make a stand and state as much.’

 

They then seek to diminish the facts so they don’t lose their job – i.e. they seek to preserve the relationship that is threatened by the facts.

 

`Maybe not every brand of vaccine will kill me, so perhaps if I take enough vitamins I won’t die if I take the vaccine. Besides, the authorities say it is safe.’

It is hoped that literate Christians will recognize the parallel between Eve in the Garden, Dialoging with the Serpent who presents another “truth” (the Antithesis) in the statement “Ye shall not surely die” (Genesis 3:4), and “God knows” that if you eat the fruit you’ll become as wise as He is. She subsequently evaluates her environment, and reasons her way into disobedience.

 

“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat” (Genesis 3:6).

 

Having seen firsthand the reaction to the “beguiling” (Genesis 3:13) system of Dragonspeak, I can testify the majority of people I have seen respond to it try to initiate a Dialogue, so they can diminish the facts established in the Holy Bible, in order to continue in their Flesh and Blood relationships!

 

“Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever” (I John 2:15-18). 

 

-- James Lloyd

 

To Be Continued